With the average cost of a security breach in U.S. exceeding $10.22 million in 2025, selecting the right access control system is more than a security decision—it’s a strategic investment.
Today, physical access control goes far beyond keys and locks; it’s about how adaptable, scalable, and cost-effective your system remains as your organization evolves. However, terms like proprietary vs non proprietary often create confusion for decision-makers.
So,
In this article, we break down the core differences between proprietary vs non proprietary access control systems, their pros & cons, and critical considerations.
Before committing to a solution, learn what to ask, what to expect, and how to find the right fit for your facility’s security and future growth.
A proprietary access control system is developed, managed, and supported entirely by a single manufacturer. It operates within a closed ecosystem, which means that all hardware, software, and accessories must be purchased from the same vendor.
This design provides seamless integration, simplified deployment, and often a more user-friendly experience, especially for organizations without in-house technical expertise.
Proprietary solutions are often designed with a central management platform and may include features tailored to the manufacturer’s own standards. For many organizations, this can simplify installation and daily operations.
However, the closed architecture limits compatibility with third-party technologies. You are locked into a single vendor’s offerings, reliant on them for future upgrades, integrations, and ongoing support. While the system may be reliable and cohesive, this lack of flexibility can restrict long-term scalability and increase costs if business needs change or the vendor’s roadmap doesn’t align with your organization’s goals.
A non proprietary access control system is built using open architecture and industry-standard protocols, rather than being tied to one specific brand or manufacturer. This approach allows the system to operate with a variety of hardware and software components from different sources. Unlike proprietary systems, where both hardware and software are often locked into a single vendor, non-proprietary setups support interoperability and wider compatibility.
These systems are designed to work seamlessly with third-party equipment, such as card readers, controllers, sensors, and management software. This open framework gives organizations the ability to configure their security systems according to their own requirements, using components that best suit their environment.
The term "non-proprietary" also applies to how these systems are purchased and maintained. Rather than relying on a single supplier for installation, updates, and repairs, organizations can work with different service providers or integrators. This model makes it easier to build and maintain systems that are specific to the site’s layout, risk profile, or operational workflow.
So, non-proprietary access control systems offer a more modular and adaptable structure, allowing users to shape their security architecture with greater flexibility and control.
When it comes to access control, there’s no one-size-fits-all. The choice between proprietary vs non proprietary systems depends on how your organization works today and where it’s headed tomorrow.
Non proprietary systems are often preferred by those who want flexibility.
Proprietary systems, meanwhile, are usually simpler to set up and manage.
There are trade-offs either way. Open systems give you more freedom, but they may take more effort to maintain. Proprietary systems offer convenience, but often at a higher cost and with less flexibility.
While choosing between proprietary vs non proprietary systems, think about your internal resources, the level of control you want, and how much support you’ll need down the line.
Access control today isn’t just about who walks through the door; it’s about keeping up with a more connected, fast-moving world. With smart buildings, remote teams, and constantly evolving risks, the systems we rely on need to be just as flexible and future-ready.
That’s where open architecture steps in, not just as a technical option, but as a smarter, long-term strategy.
Traditional proprietary systems may seem reliable. Everything comes from one vendor, and it’s all bundled up neatly. But they often tie your hands. You get locked into one vendor, one set of tools, and one way of growing. Every small change, upgrade, or expansion ends up costing more than expected.
Open architecture systems break away from the old model. It gives you the freedom to choose the technology, vendors, and solutions that work best for your space and your goals, today and tomorrow.
It creates consistent, secure, and reliable connections that third-party components can build on. With a controlled approach, providing APIs and tools to verified partners, open systems allow smooth integration while maintaining system integrity and preventing vulnerabilities.
They’re built to evolve. You won’t need to replace the entire system when your needs grow; simply add the right upgrades. That’s why open ecosystems are set to become the top access control trend in 2025.
Here’s why moving to open architecture is the way forward:
When it comes to securing modern spaces, Coram seamlessly connects access control with real-time visibility, bringing doors, cameras, and alerts together into one powerful platform.
Every access event (entry, denial, forced entry, or door held open) is automatically paired with corresponding video footage, providing instant context without requiring additional tools or integrations. This works whether you're using your existing security cameras or Coram’s own hardware options.
What sets Coram’s Access Control apart is its unified, cloud-based dashboard that streamlines the entire access control experience. From any location, with a single interface, you can:
The system eliminates the need to manage multiple vendors, making it simple and efficient for both on-site and remote operations.
Designed for flexibility and scalability, Coram supports ONVIF-compliant and RTSP-enabled cameras, allowing organizations to use their existing infrastructure without investing in proprietary hardware. Its camera-agnostic model allows organizations to upgrade and expand as security needs evolve easily.
The platform also supports multi-user, multi-site, and multi-level access, ideal for IT teams, property managers, and facility operators who require centralized control across various locations.
Coram proactively addresses common security threats like tailgating with intelligent detection features that alert you in real time when unauthorized individuals attempt to follow others inside. In the event of a power or internet outage, the system retains local access permissions, providing continued security without disruption.
By integrating access control with video surveillance and real-time alerts, Coram enhances not just security, but how teams manage and interact with their spaces. It’s a modern, open, and secure access control system—built to scale and adapt with your organization.
As security needs evolve in modern buildings and campuses, decision-makers often find themselves juggling between two paths - proprietary vs non proprietary access control systems. Both have their place, but choosing the right one is crucial for long-term flexibility, cost-efficiency, and safety.
The choice between proprietary vs non proprietary depends on your organization’s existing infrastructure, future growth plans, and the level of flexibility and control you need.
With the future of security leaning towards open, flexible, and scalable systems, non-proprietary access control systems are leading the way.
Solutions like Coram’s Access Control empower you to stay ahead. It allows you to manage unlimited users, assign or revoke access instantly, and set custom schedules effortlessly—all through a powerful, cloud-based dashboard built for today’s dynamic security needs.
So, choose an access control system that grows with you.
Proprietary data is tied to a specific vendor’s technology and often cannot be used outside of their system. It limits flexibility and integration. Non proprietary data, on the other hand, follows open standards and protocols, enabling interoperability across multiple systems and vendors, making it easier to scale and adapt over time.
Not necessarily. Security depends more on implementation, monitoring, and best practices than on whether a system is proprietary or not. While proprietary systems are often seen as “closed” and therefore more secure, open systems can be equally secure when properly configured and maintained.
Yes. Transitioning is possible and often practical. Depending on your current infrastructure, you may be able to reuse components like wiring, panels, or readers. The migration timeline varies based on system complexity but can typically be completed in a few weeks to a few months.
Generally, yes. Proprietary solutions often involve licensing fees, mandatory hardware, and vendor-specific service contracts. These added costs can accumulate over time, especially if upgrades or expansions are required.
Modern non-proprietary platforms, like Coram, offer intuitive cloud-based dashboards, remote access, and full vendor support. This reduces the technical burden on in-house teams and simplifies day-to-day system management.